New Idea
Posted by: intechemistry on: February 14, 2012
It struck me that it might be good to have discussion area specifically for past years papers on the links side-menu. E.g. June 2011 Unit 1, June 2011 Unit 2 etc. I think I’ll try and ‘expand’ the blog that way. Sound like a good idea?
May I ask: In general, do you think comments on past years papers is useful or is it unnecessary. Do you find the mark schemes good enough?
6 Responses to "New Idea"
February 15, 2012 at 8:14 pm
for me, ur comments on the mcq questions are very useful in building up our skills for answering them, so that we wont waste too much time on it. thank you.
February 16, 2012 at 1:07 am
Thank you both for the comments.
There are mark schemes for ALL papers, so I think it best to ‘open the floor’ for all papers (and indeed, that’s what I’ve done). Someone (inc. me) might overlook a question worthy of deeper discussion or simply require it.
P.S. ‘Bai’, I’ve left an answer for you regarding that O.S. of Fe question you asked me about previously. See here: http://intechemistry.wordpress.com/2010/09/24//U5-June-2009-old-S/
February 16, 2012 at 5:40 pm
Sir, Can we knw wat inspired u to come about with this ? hahaax
February 16, 2012 at 7:31 pm
I can’t remember exactly, but it’s just a small extension of what has already transpired on this blog. Glad people seem to be in favour of it 
Leave a Reply
Authors
umiazuraRecent Comments
 | Kosher on 2.8 Kinetics |
 | Awesome on Smartie-pants |
| Iintechemistry on Smartie-pants |
| Awesome on Smartie-pants |
| Iintechemistry on Smartie-pants |
| Awesome on Smartie-pants |
| Iintechemistry on May/June 2012, Unit6b |
| Iintechemistry on Smartie-pants |
| Awesome on May/June 2012, Unit6b |
| Awesome on Smartie-pants |
February 14, 2012 at 10:06 pm
infact, a very good idea sir..
comment for past year paper important for me especially for question that contribute high mark e.g (4-6) marks.
maybe we can try with question that do not have marking scheme first (just a idea)…
thanks.